Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Advanced Melanoma: 10-Year Outcomes Turn Heads

You May Be Interested In:Minnesota state lawmaker killed, another wounded in targeted shootings


TOPLINE:

The final, 10-year results of the international randomised clinical trial known as CheckMate 067 report that the median overall survival with advanced melanoma is nearly 72 months with the combination of nivolumab + ipilimumab, nearly 37 months with nivolumab monotherapy, and only 20 months with ipilimumab monotherapy. Both agents are immune checkpoint inhibitors, but their immune targets differ.

METHODOLOGY:

  • A double-blinded, phase 3, randomised clinical trial (CheckMate 067) comparing nivolumab + ipilimumab (n = 314) vs monotherapy with either nivolumab (n = 316) or ipilimumab (n = 315) and comparing one monotherapy to the other.
  • The primary outcomes were overall survival and progression-free survival.

TAKEAWAY:

  • At 10 years, the median overall survival for nivolumab + ipilimumab, nivolumab, and ipilimumab was 71.9, 36.9, and 19.9 months, respectively.
  • At 10 years, the median progression-free survival for nivolumab + ipilimumab, nivolumab, and ipilimumab was 11.5, 6.9, and 2.9 months, respectively.
  • At 10 years, the median melanoma-specific survival for nivolumab + ipilimumab, nivolumab, and ipilimumab was not reached, 49.4 months, and 21.9 months, respectively.
  • The overall survival for patients who had been alive and progression-free at 3 years for nivolumab + ipilimumab (n = 100), nivolumab (n = 78), and ipilimumab (n = 21) was not reached in all groups.

IN PRACTICE:

The authors concluded that “as compared with ipilimumab monotherapy, nivolumab-containing therapies have continued to show a prolonged survival benefit in patients with advanced melanoma, with no new safety signals. These 10-year data underscore how immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has helped to change the long-term prognosis for patients with advanced melanoma and highlight the potential for a cure in patients who have response to this type of treatment.”

SOURCE:

The lead and corresponding author is Jedd D Wolchok of the Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York. The study appeared online in The New England Journal of Medicine.

LIMITATIONS:

Approximately 40% of patients did not respond to treatment.

DISCLOSURES:

Multiple authors declared competing interests. The study received funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, among others.

share Paylaş facebook pinterest whatsapp x print

Similar Content

Watch: 'Going It Alone' — A Conversation About Growing Old in America - KFF Health News
Watch: ‘Going It Alone’ — A Conversation About Growing Old in America – KFF Health News
Neuro Break over a computer rendering of neurons.
Ozempic for Alzheimer’s? What Drives Brain Age; Primary Care Alzheimer’s Guideline
New NIH tool uses genAI to connect volunteers with clinical trials
New NIH tool uses genAI to connect volunteers with clinical trials
Why it matters that weight loss drugs are one of Oprah Winfrey's new favorite things
Why it matters that weight loss drugs are one of Oprah Winfrey’s new favorite things
Focus Turns to Rebuilding in Los Angeles
Focus Turns to Rebuilding in Los Angeles
a row of tents along a street in Los Angeles
Trump Turns Homelessness Response Away From Housing, Toward Forced Treatment – KFF Health News
Today's Insight | © 2025 | News